Riting is Easie: Learn the Rules Before You Break Them
In response to this.
I, for one, don’t believe that artists have the right to make mistakes. Oh no. A mistake is an error… an unconscious lapse of judgment. I believe that mistakes are inexcusable in any work of art. An artist is responsible for the entirety of his work and if said work is replete with errors it merely shows the quality of the artist. When a writer, for instance, publishes his work (whether in print or online) and expects people to read it, he immediately becomes a target. His mistakes become the ammunition with which his critics will assault him. Typo error? Okay, we can let that pass as long as you fix it. If you can’t fix it, or cannot recognize what to fix in the first place, then it’s not a typo error. It’s a mistake.
What an artist is entitled to, however, is breaking the rules. Breaking the rules is not an unconscious lapse of judgement. It’s not a mistake. It’s a conscious effort to fuck the established criteria of what’s right and what’s wrong. And before an artist can break the rules, he must know these rules intimately. Look at Picasso. Before he invented abstract painting, his paintings were of the more conventional kind (Picasso’s Blue Period, which, I must say, isn’t bad at all, no… it was actually fantastic, but not as fantastic as his abstracts). Picasso knew the rules enough to break them.
Grammar. Oh, yes, grammar. This is undoubtedly the Waterloo of most writers writing with a second language. There is greater pressure for Filipinos writing in English to know the rules because if we don’t, then we have no business writing in English since we have our own language. If a Filipino writer begs to be given quarter when it comes to grammar since English isn’t his mother tongue, quarter will be given, surely, but he must stop calling himself a writer. He’s just a guy who knows enough English to be able to communicate with it. A writer must excel in his language of choice.
Notice: I said “know the rules” not “follow the rules.” Again I must emphasize that an artist has the right to break the rules so long as he knows them. If he goes on and breaks the rules without knowing them, it will show. Believe you I it will show. Now that was breaking the rules. I should’ve said “believe me.” Instead, I chose “believe you I” because it’s faux Elizabethan English, which gave my statement a slightly humorous twist. “Humorous” being arguable.
Counter argument: I’m just an amateur so get off my case.
If you’re an amateur, then you have no business letting strangers read your work. Show your stuff to your family and friends. Or maybe keep them in a box. Whatever you do, don’t publish them on the internet.
Look, not all of us have impeccable grammar. If you find people criticizing yours but you still want to publish your stuff then get someone to proofread your work first. This is not embarrassing. This is why there are editors. Hell, I’ll even do it for you. Free of charge! All you gotta do is ask. “Gotta” instead of “have to” because I want to sound informal and chummy. And that last sentence was a fragment as my grammar check informs me with a glaring green zig-zag underline. And you don’t start sentences with “and.”
And in case some are wondering why I’m not making too much of an effort to sound like an internet asshole today (as is usually my wont), come closer. Closer. Listen:
Fuck off.
I posted a bunch of my 





